I’m continuing with my theme from last week of highlighting books that appeal to kids (not just grownups). Today I’m going to share another favorite at my house. It’s not a book that I’ve heard a lot of buzz online about, but I enjoyed it as well as my 12-year-old, who read the third book in two days.
If you enjoy omniscient narrators, families on the run, books about scientists, and time machines, this one’s for you.
The synopsis for the first book:
Mr. Cheeseman, his three relatively odor-free children, a psychic hairless dog, and a sock puppet named Steve are on the run. Why? Because Mr. Cheeseman invented a time machine, of course. Now they're being chased by international super spies, top secret government agents, and a genius monkey. Dr. Cuthbert Soup, the head of the Center of Unsolicited Advice, narrates this wild adventure that will lead readers straight into next season's sequel: Another Whole Nother Story.
What I found interesting about this series is that it broke a couple writing rules.
- The kid characters names kept changing. Usually it’s best to keep character names simple, so as not to confuse readers. But in A Whole Nother Story, the kid characters pick their own new names whenever they are on the run. I admit it could be hard to adjust to as a reader, but I loved how this added whimsy to the narrative. What kid doesn’t fantasize about choosing a new name?
- The main character is an adult. Parents usually need to get out of the way in kidlit. But the dad, Ethan Cheeseman, is a major character in this series. Although the kids solve many of the problems, the story wouldn’t happen without their dad. It’s his story—of building the time machine and losing his wife—that drives the narrative.A couple of other things I enjoyed:
- The omniscient narrator. I love Cuthbert Soup’s unsolicited advice sprinkled throughout the book, his plays on words, and general fun. My son particularly enjoyed his interesting takes on history.
- An interesting premise: Who wouldn’t want to read about a family on the run? Throw in some government agents, a mother dying under mysterious circumstances, and a time machine (that may or may not be used for nefarious purposes) and I was hooked. I also liked how the question of finding out what happened to the mother was carried through all three books to completion in book 3.
- Interesting side characters: Whether it’s circus performers without a circus or pirates, Soup never takes his characters too seriously.
- Oh, and did I mention there’s a sock puppet named Steve?If you are a fan of omniscient narrators who have their own story like in Lemony Snicket’s SERIES OF UNFORTUNATE EVENTS or Maryrose Wood’s THE INCORRIGIBLE CHILDREN OF ASHTON PLACE, you will love this book. It is not as dark as Snicket nor as cerebral as INCORRIBLE CHILDREN, but a lot of fun.*It’s interesting to me that many of the books that children love and are huge commercial successes are omniscient narrators. To me, this is breaking another rule, because writers are often advised to avoid omniscient.What do you think is the appeal of omniscient narrators?
I don't love omniscient narrators. I can't get as close to the characters. Sounds like a fun read but the changing names could get confusing.
ReplyDeleteFor me, it depends on my mood. I like omniscient if the narrator is whimsical or funny, but I'm not a fan of head hopping! But I also love a close 3rd person or 1st too. Thanks for stopping by!
DeleteYou had me at Mr. Cheeseman and the sock puppet!
ReplyDeleteHa! Steve (the sock puppet) has some of the best lines. :)
DeleteThere are not many books with omniscient narrators out there and this one sounds just wacky enough to keep a reader entertained. The premise is unique and I would guess it would make a great read-aloud.
ReplyDeleteIt's definitely wacky and suspenseful as well. It would make a great read aloud!
DeleteNice to see a parent with a prominent roll in the story.
ReplyDeleteI agree!
DeleteI think it's tricky to get omniscient narration right, but when it's done well it gives the reader the sense of being complicit with the narrator, as in, "nudge, nudge, you and I understand what's going on here, but those poor characters are in for a nasty surprise!" Or like being invited backstage: you're not just the audience anymore; you're privileged to see the inner workings of the story. (Dramatic irony and breaking down the fourth wall, if you want to be technical.) Done poorly it just sounds like the writer is trying too hard, or that they think they're clever. (So if you're a writer, don't try this unless you actually are clever!)
ReplyDeleteGood point, Kim. I think it's probably the hardest POV of view to pull off well, which is probably why my first writing teacher advised against it. In addition to the nudge, nudge, I like how these types of books have two stories going on--the main story and the narrator's story (which sort of feels like a secret story). Thanks for stopping by, Kim!
ReplyDeleteI have to admit, I find it hard to read omniscient narration stories. It is so hard to do well, but this one sounds like it might just be worth the effort. Thanks for the review.
ReplyDelete